STUDIA QUATERNARIA | ||
Journal Editors History Subscription Statement Articles Current Issue Archives In press For authors Instruction For reviewers Instruction Reviewers (2013 - |
Review - Instruction (in pdf)
All
manuscripts submitted to Studia Quaternaria undergo review. All
manuscripts will be reviewed by two referees according to review form (see Sq-review-form). 1. The
review consists of two stages: an internal review by subject editors and an
external review by two independent reviewers chosen from outside the
institution(s) represented by the author(s) of the article. 2. The
reviewers are competent in the subjects covered by the article or in the field
of science to which the article refers. The reviewers are appointed by the
Editor-in-Chief. The editors ensure that there are no conflicts of interest
between any of the reviewers and the author(s). The authors do not know the
identity of the reviewers, unless a reviewer expresses a will to be identified. 3. The
outcome of the review will be put in written form. The reviewers will be asked
to fill out a questionnaire also. The review includes a clear conclusion as to
whether the article should be published or rejected. 4. Two
positive reviews by external reviewers determine acceptance of an article for
publication, and two negative ones determine rejection. If the two reviews
reach opposing conclusions a third reviewer is appointed, and his/her
assessment is decisive. 5. After
review, the author(s) will be informed of the results of the evaluation. When
an article is deemed to require changes, the author(s) will have an opportunity
to improve it according to the reviewers’ suggestions. 6. The
author(s) are required to make the necessary corrections indicated by the
reviewers. In case of disagreement with the reviewers, the author(s) should
submit a written reply to the reviewers’ comments. The Editor-in-Chief will
consider whether the author(s) have justified their disagreement with the
corrections suggested by the reviewer. 7. At the
request of the reviewer, the corrections that the author(s) have made may be
reviewed again. 8. Once a
year a list of the reviewers from the calendar year is published on the journal
webpage and in a printed issue of the journal. |
Reviewers
2023 vol. 40 (1, 2) 2022 vol. 39 (1, 2) 2021 vol. 38 (1, 2) 2020 vol. 37 (1, 2) 2019 vol. 36 (1, 2) 2018 vol. 35 (1, 2) 2017 vol. 34 (1, 2) 2016 vol. 33 (1, 2) 2015 vol. 32 (1, 2) 2014 vol. 31 (1, 2) 2013 vol. 30 (1, 2) |